Your field is not listed?
The reading is about lived experience, not about a speciality.
Fifteen minutes, no questionnaire, online or in person.
The synthesis comes ranked: what weighs most sits at the top.
Nothing is asked, so nothing is arranged: we do not measure what a person says about themselves, but the way they perceive.
No account, no card. You see part of your results.
The recovery reserve and the capacities of the moment, from the most strained to the most available.
It is not the first appointment that changes, it is the way you work afterwards. Four effects, from first contact to follow-up.
The ordering is already done when you open the file. You open the session where you would usually have arrived after an hour, and you keep that thread through every session that follows.
They no longer have to take your word for it: they are looking at their own map. Explaining becomes showing, and what you propose next speaks for itself.
Advice sorted by direction and by horizon: what they start today, hold over the week, anchor over the month. Then a follow-up test that shows the shift. The session lasts until the next one.
Every direction rests on something the client has in front of them. Your words gain precision, and the relationship gains trust.
The simplest way is still to take it yourself. Fifteen minutes, no account, and you see what the test gives.
The choice is made before the test. Everything calculated afterwards is set by it.
Your field is not listed?
The reading is about lived experience, not about a speciality.
Choose a domain to see what it draws out.
No score, no profile. A synthesis to open the session, a report to go deep. An assessment is both.
One page, read in five minutes, before the client walks in.
What lies behind the synthesis: the detail organ by organ, the four balance matrices, enough to dig into an area or understand a link the session raised. You take from it what lights up the session, and choose what stays with the client, for as long as you decide.
01 · The viewer
02 · The client's path
03 · The expert synthesis
The client does not see this screen. They see their own map, in words that need no explaining, and they leave with what you chose to leave them, for as long as you decide.
The Strannik makes no diagnosis and does not replace a health professional. It structures your reading, it does not do it for you.
It comes before everything else, and it is a fair one. Here is what stands behind the product, in four pieces, in the order you can check them.
The model is published
In Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a peer-reviewed journal indexed in PubMed. DOI 10.1093/ecam/nel060.
The lineage is dated
A mathematical model developed from 1981 to 1997 by Dr Igor Grakov, based on named earlier work. Around eighty publications between 2003 and 2018.
The results converge
82% in 2002 on 370 patients, 85% in 2016 on 20, 87% in 2017 on 50. Three teams, three countries, three decades: the reading agrees with the diagnoses already known for those people.
And measured gains, not only agreement
Twenty volunteers, checked five times over their twenty sessions, by electroencephalography and cardiovascular testing: +33.7% contraction speed, +31.6% alpha rhythm, +30.4% relaxation speed, all at p < 0.001.
What the test does, and what no questionnaire can copy: it asks nothing. Nothing to declare, so nothing to arrange: no desirability, no self-diagnosis, no effect of wording. It can be checked in fifteen minutes, and it is the one strong claim of the product that needs no regulatory permission.
PPS for Physio-Psycho Scanner.
A dated origin, named authors, a continuity with no gap. That is what separates a technology from a method that appeared last year.
The technology continues the work of Dr Igor Grakov, physician and mathematician, who developed from 1981 to 1997 a biomathematical model representing cognitive processes as information-processing systems.
A second strand was developed between 2001 and 2005 on the basis of work in Emotional Dynamics by Dr Jean-Pierre Garitte and Dr Jimmy Eerebout, specialists in psychosomatics.
The Strannik is its application: an interface that carries the model towards individual analysis, then towards regulation work.
The Strannik asks no question about history or about feelings. It observes the way a person restores a colour that has been altered. It is a spectro-dynamic analysis: it reads a way of doing, not an answer.
The real test sequence, sped up. The veil that falls is the software's, and the six controls below are the ones the person has to hand.
An image appears
A few seconds on screen, sometimes a short scene rather than a still view.
A filter alters it
It is coloured, it applies itself: the person triggered nothing.
The person restores it
They try to find the original colours again using the controls.
The sequence repeats
Over a series of images, from three to thirteen: it stops when the way of doing it becomes steady, not when a counter is full. Fifteen minutes, twenty at most. At home from a browser, or next to you from your own screen.
The gap between what is seen and what is restored.
The strategy used to come back towards the colour.
The path through the controls and the speed of execution.
The chromatic detail of the restoration.
Neither performance nor visual memory is assessed. Everything that happens in the body and in the psychic life goes through the brain, and that passage leaves a mark on the way a person perceives what surrounds them: it is their perception filter. The test observes how the nervous system handles disturbed information, and what it brings to bear to reorganise it.
Personalised visual sequences, calculated from the test result, extend the reading. They are composed from a catalogue of 24 correction programmes.
The person watches coloured animations. No deliberate action is required.
No electrical stimulation, no substance, no physical intervention.
Sessions are done from a computer, a few dozen minutes each.
Regulation unfolds over several weeks, at the person's own pace.
The aim is not to correct a symptom, but to support the nervous system's capacity to reorganise itself.
Five practitioners, five different practices. We asked them what had changed, not what they thought of the product.
“Before, my first appointment was for understanding. Now it is for working. I arrive with a reading already laid out, and I spend the hour on what matters instead of spending it asking questions.”
Claire Benoît · naturopath · Annecy
“What changed is the moment the person reads their report. They do not argue, they recognise themselves. From there they come back, and they do what we decided together.”
Marc Delaunay · sophrologist · Bordeaux
“I run a second test after six sessions and I show the shift. It is the first time I have had something to put on the table in front of someone who doubts what they perceive of themselves.”
Sylvie Marchand · reflexologist · Nantes
“I worked on feel, and it worked, but I could not say why. Now I have the words and the order: what I treat first, and what can wait.”
Nathalie Ferrand · kinesiologist · Toulouse
“I feared a piece of software would impose its own grid on me. It lights up mine. I see where to start, and I work exactly the way I have always worked.”
Pierre Vasseur · brief therapy practitioner · Lyon
Three steps, and you only climb if the previous one convinced you. First the test on yourself, without an account. Then three free reports on your own clients, at the time of the access request. The subscription only comes after that.
You take the real test and read part of your results. The point is not to believe us, it is to see what it says about you.
Your clients take the test, you receive the full reading and you follow their progress. Preparing a session stops being research work.
When it becomes the entry point of your work and no longer a trial. You set it up once, it holds for the year.
They are not folded into the list below: they decide, so they are readable without a click.
And what if it does not stick with me?
Do it on yourself first, without an account, and look at what it gives. Only then does the practitioner trial open three full reports on your clients. After that, monthly access can be cancelled each month, with no notice and no penalty. You never commit beyond the current month.
Fifteen minutes taken out of my consultation?
No: the client takes the test alone, at home or in your waiting room, from a browser. You are not there. When the session begins, the synthesis is ready, and you read it in five minutes. And if you would rather have them beside you, in-person mode runs the test from your own machine and shows the result on your working screen: you comment while they are there.
Is this a diagnosis? Am I exposing myself?
No. No screen names an illness or points to a cause. The body landmarks say where the load concentrates, not where it comes from. Your scope as a practitioner does not change, and neither does your responsibility: only your reading is structured.
Will my clients accept this test?
Nothing intimate is asked of them: they put colours back in place for fifteen minutes. No question about their history, no form to fill in. And what they see at the end is your choice, block by block.
How is this better than a good questionnaire?
A good questionnaire works, but it puts all the work on the person: understanding a thousand questions, choosing their words, holding out to the end. Here the information arrives directly, without them having to tell their story. They put colours back in place, and you receive the reading.
€397 is a real budget when you practise on your own.
It is a budget, yes. Here is how we look at it. A first appointment often goes on getting your bearings, and a client who cannot see where they stand stops after two sessions. Both already cost you, every month, without ever appearing on an invoice. The Strannik acts on both. And you do not have to take our word for it: the first three reports are free, on your own clients.
It works by referral. If a practitioner sent you their link, use it to create your account. This is not a sign-up: every practitioner is guided when their access opens.
Yes. The training test is open to everyone, without an account: it follows the real sequence, without producing a result.
No. The test runs in the browser, from a computer, at your place or theirs. There is no software and no box.
No, and the screen that comes closest says the opposite. “Everyday functioning” does not sort traits into good and bad: it shows which ones are serving as support right now, and which ones cost energy. The same trait can change sides from one test to the next.
To body landmarks. Each area that stands out carries its own, with a psychosomatic reading of what it may relate to, and a programme can be opened for that area. The expert synthesis gathers them under “vulnerable psychosomatic areas”. These are reading markers, not organs found guilty.
Yes, it is built into the journey: a follow-up test is compared with the previous one, and the shift between them reads directly.
The client. Your access to their results rests on their consent, which they give when registering and can withdraw at any time from their space.
Each assessment uses one credit, cheaper by the batch. The subscription spreads over the month’s assessments: the more you run, the less each one weighs. Below about ten a month, the subscription weighs more than the tool.
What you do with it next is yours. Fold it into the session you already bill, and win back the time that went into finding your bearings. Or make it a service of its own, because the client leaves with a reading they keep. We do not set that price.
From your space, at any time, with no notice and no penalty. Access stays open until the end of the month paid for. Credits already bought do not expire.
We come back to you within 48 working hours, then we take time to talk before any access. That is where you are walked through the tool.
No account, no card. Practitioner access requests receive a reply within 48 working hours.
For users who already have access.