The ones that decide are on the home page. These go all the way, including where the answer does not suit us.
A reading tool: the person takes a fifteen-minute test with no questionnaire, and you receive an ordered summary on the concern you chose. It is a map of questions for your consultation, not a verdict.
No. Strannik is not registered as a medical device and appears in no clinical trial database. It is written in our terms and we do not hide it. If you are looking for a clinically validated instrument, this is not what we offer.
No. No screen names an illness or points to a cause. The bodily markers say where the load gathers, not where it comes from. The interpretation stays yours.
A good questionnaire works, but it puts the work on the person: understanding the questions, choosing their words, holding on to the end. Here they declare nothing. They put colours back in place, and what is measured is the gap between the colour shown and the one they bring back.
Fifteen minutes, twenty at most. The series stops when the way of going about it becomes regular, not when a counter is full: it runs from three to thirteen images.
No. The test runs in a browser, from a computer. There is no software to set up and no box to plug in.
No. They take the test at home, and the summary is ready when the session starts. If you would rather have them beside you, in-person mode launches the test from your own machine and shows the result on your screen.
Nothing intimate is asked of them: they put colours back in place for fifteen minutes. No question about their history, no form to fill in. And what they see at the end is your choice.
Yes, it is built into the path. A follow-up test is compared with the previous one and the gap reads directly, instead of asking the person how they feel.
A one-page summary, to read in five minutes before the client comes in, and behind it a report of more than fifty pages to dig into a zone or make sense of a link the session raised.
No, and the screen that comes closest says the opposite. It does not sort traits into good and bad: it shows which ones serve as support right now, and which ones cost energy. The same trait can change sides from one test to the next.
On bodily markers. Each zone that stands out carries its own, with a psychosomatic reading of what it may connect to. They are reading markers, not organs declared guilty.
No. The reading stands on its own, and practitioners have used it for years without ever opening a programme. Regulation is an option you decide to open, or not.
By recommendation, and after a conversation. You write, we come back to you within 48 working hours, and we take time to walk you through it before anything opens. This is not a sign-up.
There are several plans, and the detail is on the pricing page, with a calculator that says how many readings a month each one starts to hold at.
From your own space, at any time, with no notice and no penalty. Access stays open until the end of the month paid for, and credits already bought do not expire.
The client. Your access to their results rests on their consent, given at sign-up and withdrawable at any time from their space.
You keep it, along with your machine and your software, and your records come across in one move. Write to us: your price is not the public one.
The reading is about lived experience, not about a speciality. Tell us about your practice: that is what says whether the tool belongs in it.
Write to us, we answer. And if you would rather judge for yourself, the test takes no account and no card.
For users who already have access.